Editorial Policy and Review Methodology

AIComu aims to publish useful, verifiable product research. The site distinguishes official specifications, independently reported evidence and its own hands-on measurements.

Source hierarchy

  1. Primary sources: official product pages, policies, app listings and documentation for current prices and features.
  2. Independent evidence: credible hands-on reviews or testing where the method and device are clear.
  3. Editorial analysis: calculations and buying guidance derived from disclosed inputs.

Hands-on language

A page says “tested,” “measured” or “we found” only when AIComu actually performed the stated test and can describe the conditions. A research review is labelled as such. Unfilled testing worksheets are kept out of search results until measurements exist.

Prices and changing facts

Commercial facts include a checked date. Readers should verify the final checkout total because discounts, taxes, shipping, currency and plan terms can change without notice.

Ratings and structured data

AIComu does not publish fabricated ratings or review schema. A numerical score should reflect a documented evaluation, not a conversion target.

Corrections

Material factual errors are corrected promptly. A correction should update the visible copy, metadata and machine-readable information together so search engines and readers receive the same facts.

Commercial independence

Affiliate commissions do not change the price paid by a reader and do not permit a manufacturer to approve editorial conclusions. Sponsored links are marked for users and search engines.